terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016

Coluna Claquete - June 2nd, 2016 - Movies of the Week: "The Eternal Zero" and "Emperor"



 


 

Newton Ramalho

 

colunaclaquete@gmail.com - www.colunaclaquete.blogspot.com - @colunaclaquete

 

Movies of the Week: "The Eternal Zero" and "Emperor"

The history of humanity is full of conflicts, many of them of catastrophic proportions, and, by the way, without much prospect of change. Trying to get a glimpse of what was one of the world greatest conflicts, World War II, I propose to the reader two films about the war and one of its most complex actors, Japan. The films are "The Eternal Zero" and "Emperor".
Japan's culture has always been complex and diverse from nearby countries, mainly due to self apartness imposed by their leaders, and that was only broken - by force of guns - by Europeans and Americans in the mid-19th century.
Up to that time the country was in a feudal system, with a highly stratified society, with an emperor worshiped as a living god, but where the real power remained in the hands of feudal lords.
The arrival of the Westerners obliged them to see how the country was technologically lagged behind the rest of the world, and then happened a sudden and traumatic change when a society that maintained the same habits for a thousand years was forced to adopt new habits and lifestyle.
This sudden change, combined with an increasing militarization, and a desire to expansion repressed for centuries, made Japan turn into a different country, belligerent and ambitious for new resources.This change was notably portrayed in the movie "The Last Samurai".
The early 20th century was a period of affirmation of the power of war of the Japanese, who came to defeat the powerful Russia in a dispute over some islands. Over the decades, the Japanese invaded part of China, Korea and other Asian countries, and later became involved in World War II, partner to Germany and Italy.
The film "The Eternal Zero" takes a look under the stance of the Japanese soldier, especially the suicide pilots, who threw their planes on Allied ships. These aircraft, called Zero, were a highly advanced technological design at the time of its release, and with a group of experienced pilots was a set virtually unbeatable.
Nowadays, after grandmother's death, two brothers, Kentaro (Haruma Miura) and Keiko (Kazue Fukiishi), discovered that the one they knew as grandfather was not their biological grandfather. Their real grandfather had died in World War II.
They decide to investigate more about it, but when interviewing former colleagues of their grandfather, only received negative comments, most of them saying he had been a selfish coward. Only a few of them assumed that Miyabe (Okada Jun'ichi) was one of the best pilots of the Japanese Navy, and clashed with colleagues because he desagrred with the obsession of dying for the country blindly.He believed that everyone should do their utmost to survive the war and return to their families.
A few friends were able to realize the greatness of Miyabe, and the sacrifices he made to protect peers and students in the war. These discoveries about his grandfather causes in Kentaro changes in his own life and his way of seeing the world. Some secrets are revealed, while others will rest forever in silence.
"The Eternal Zero" is a well-directed film with several scenes of aerial combat, and many flashbacks, but with a well-told story thanks to the script well built. The dialogues may seem strange to Westerners, because the Japanese language is very guttural, and it always seems that they are in a deadly game.
The second film in question is "Emperor". The historical moment depicted in the movie is the period immediately after Japan's surrender in World War II. This surrender, carried out after the explosion of two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved thousands of lives, japanese and americans, that would have been lost if the conflict had continued.
After the surrender, Japan was occupied by US forces commanded by General Douglas MacArthur (Tommy Lee Jones), who assumed the post of supreme leader of the occupation. MacArthur had political ambitions and wanted to run for the presidency of the United States, using his image of war hero.
To satisfy voters eagers for vengeance, he had to point and send to trial the war criminals, as happened with the German top officials at Nuremberg.
Among all the names, one was the most dubious. Japan's Emperor Hirohito (Takatarô Kataoka) was appointed by the Western press as the main responsible for atrocities committed by Japan before and during the war. On the other hand, arrest and possibly hang a man who was considered a god by the Japanese population would be enough to ignite the country with revolts of unimaginable extension.
MacArthur determines his general assistant Bonner Fellers (Matthew Fox) to investigate on the liability of Hirohito and their participation in decisions on war, especially the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Fellers always admired Japanese culture, and had done studies about the Nipponese soldier, long before the start of the conflict. He begins to interview top people from the Japanese government, seeking clues to justify the guilt or innocence of the emperor.
At the same time, he investigates the whereabouts of Aya Shimada (Eriko Hatsune), a Japanese teacher who met at university, and by whom he had fallen in loveThe two investigations seem to have no definition in the midst of a war-torn country.
Although being a western movie, the plot tries to show the ambiguous Emperor situation, a symbolic figure that was considered a deity by the population, and at the same time devoid of real power in an extremely complex culture where the individual is never more important than the collective.
Both films are interesting and historically rich, showing a different side of Japan that we are normally used to seeing on screen.
 

terça-feira, 24 de maio de 2016

Coluna Claquete - May 19th, 2016 - Movie of the Week: "Nobody Wants the Night"





Newton Ramalho

 

colunaclaquete@gmail.comwww.colunaclaquete.blogspot.com  - @colunaclaquete


Movie of the Week: "Nobody Wants the Night"

I remember when I was a kid, we used to see explorers as heroes who traveled to distant places, exciting the imagination of ordinary people.Although these gentlemen have been really special, they hardly would have been successful without the support of ordinary people, who then were deliberately ignored and forgotten. A film that helps us to think about it is "Nobody Wants the Night," directed by Catalan filmmaker Isabel Coixet.
In the film we follow the story of Josephine Peary, lived by magnificent French actress Juliette Binoche. Josephine was wife of the famous explorer Robert Peary, who made ​​several expeditions to the Arctic, always in search of the geographic North Pole.
Josephine was as adventurous as her husband, and also dominated by her husband's obsession to reach the Pole.She has even accompanied her husband despite being pregnant, giving birth in full Arctic, and her daughter received the nickname "snow baby".
In the early 20th century she went in search of her husband, who had ventured on another expedition. Contrary to the opinion of all the friends who lived in the area, she insisted on moving forward, even when winter was very close.
With great difficulty and loss of life and supplies, she arrived in an outpost where she decided to await the arrival of Peary - again against the advice of the local guide. The only person who stayed in place was Allaka (Rinko Kikuchi), a young Inuit.For the uninitiated, even if always been treated as "Eskimos", the northern inhabitants of Canada prefer to be called Inuit.
Intrigued with that girl, Josephine discovered that Allaka had something in common with her, it was the explorer himself! At begining, the coexistence was difficult, but with the arrival of winter, they were obliged to help each other. More than that, they have to feed and protect another person, because the girl was pregnant.
Life became impossible because the winter was very hard, with sun hiding for six months, and bringing terrible consequences.
The dramatization of the events had some poetic license, but brings out how the natives everywhere were regarded and treated by white explorers. Arrogant, disrespectful, and judging themselves masters of all, they had the sole purpose of their mission, even if to achieve it, I took the sacrifice of local people.
At a time when men dominated all the activities, it was common for women to be considered an accessory. The practice of arranging native companions were common, though - as actually happened - they and their children were deliberately forgotten, with the return of explorers to civilization.
Interestingly, the right arm of Peary was a black man, named Matthew Henson, who appears briefly in the current movie.Henson, whose life also inspired the movie "Glory & Honor," despite having a vital role in Peary expeditions, spent decades being magisterially ignored.Henson also had an Inuit companion, as Peary, and as his master, he left everything behind to go home. In 1986, the Harvard Foundation researchers sought descendants of Peary and Henson and found the children of two, Kali and Anauakaq respectively.
One might think that this was the behavior of the past, but when we see the devastation that the "civilized man" causes in nature and people living in invaded environments, we see that the predatory behavior continues.
In such an intolerance environment that we live in, it's always interesting to stop and think whether what we do is right, or if we are so brutalized that we do not realize what is our true role in this world of God.
 


terça-feira, 10 de maio de 2016

Coluna Claquete - May 10th, 2016 - Movies of the Week: "A Love to Hide" and "Welcome"





 

Newton Ramalho

 

colunaclaquete@gmail.com - www.colunaclaquete.blogspot.com - @colunaclaquete

 


Movies of the Week: "A Love to Hide" and "Welcome"

Although with nuances of all kinds, I believe that the root of all humanity's problems lies simply on intolerance, this feeling that causes everything bad that surrounds us always. By coincidence, this weekend I saw two French films that prove this theory, although they deal with different issues.The films are "A Love to Hide" and "Welcome".
The title, "A Love to Hide" leads to this controversial drama, which revolves around a Jewish girl and her gay friends, two dangerous and deadly conditions anywhere under the domination Nazi, during World War II.
Sarah (Louise Monot) was a French Jewish girl whose family was murdered by a man who was willing to help them to escape. She found shelter with her childhood friend Jean Lavandier (Jérémie Renier), with who she had a teenage love affair. Jean, meanwhile, was living a forbbiden affair with Phillipe (Bruno Todeschini), in whose house he gives a secure place to Sarah.
The trio live well despite the Nazi occupation and the earnest collaboration of many French who did not hesitate to denounce Jews and steal the goods from those who fled. Among these is Jacques (Nicolas Gob), the younger brother of Jean, which causes a tragedy when denouncing his brother for being in love with Sarah.
The film shows this side of the war that many prefer to forget, the collaboration of many French with enemies, and the cruel manner in which homosexuals in Germany and occupied countries were treated, being sent to concentration camps where they were submited to experiments, lobotomies and executions.
It is estimated that between 90 and 100 thousand homosexuals were sento to camps, of which 15 thousand were executed.The French law of 1942 which criminalized homosexuality was lifted only in 1981.
The second film, "Welcome", deals with a more recent problem, illegal immigrants trying to reach England, but find in France difficult choices to get to their final destination.
It is strange to know that France, a country with a tradition to welcome political and persecuted refugees, kept in his Foreigners Entry and Stay Code some articles penalizing with imprisonment and a fine of 30,000 euros citizens that help, transport or shelter any illegal immigrant. But questions concerning immigrants are not limited to laws and authorities, but also to attitudes of the French themselves.
In the film we find young Iraqi Kurdish Kalil (Firat Ayverdi) in the last stage of the long journey that brought him from Iraq towards England, where he hopes to meet his girlfriend Mina (Derya Ayverdi).
In Calais, the nearest French city of England, only 32 kilometers separate the two countries, at the narrowest point of the English Channel. The problem is that all modes of transport are highly monitored, the most frequent smuggling of persons in cargo trucks.
To avoid supervision that detects the presence of people through the CO2 level, illegal immigrants put plastic bags over their heads. This ends up being a problem for Kalil, who was traumatized after spending eight days tied up and with a bag over his head on the border of Turkey. They are discovered, taken to court and marked with indelible ink on the hand, which resembles tattoos of Nazi concentration camps.
The similarities do not stop there, they are prevented from shopping at markets, they are beaten by the police, and any French to help them is denounced by the neighbors themselves.
Simon Calmat (Vincent Lindon) is a swimming teacher who lives oblivious to these dramas, immersed in his own life, shaken by the separation of his wife Marion (Audrey Dana), by whom he is still in love.
Simon meets Kalil by chance, who is determined to use another way to get to England: crossing the English Channel by swim.Simon tries to convince him to give up the idea, because only professional swimmers, with a good support team managed to accomplish the feat, but the young man is even decided.
Although the film is 2009, the conditions of migrants in Calais only got worse with time, although the humanitarian efforts to improve the living conditions of those people who just lost everything, are harassed around the clock, and still are accused of being terrorists.
These two films show the strength of French cinema that remains one of the world's best, not only by the number of films produced, but also for daring in the way important issues are presented to the public.